Weird Regulatory Lawsuits Flooding New Jersey Courts, Blindsiding Businesses

The judicial system was not designed with business regulation in mind. Nevertheless, over the past few years New Jersey businesses have faced an increasing number of regulatory-based lawsuits, many of them quite frivolous in nature. These lawsuits are not being brought by the government, but by private attorneys empowered to enforce obscure business regulations on the government’s behalf.

By |2015-08-28T13:44:45-04:00August 28, 2015|News, Top Stories|0 Comments

Is Litigation the Best Way to Regulate Business?

A number of New Jersey’s state regulatory provisions specify statutory penalties for violations. Having a defined penalty enhances predictability and reduces inconsistent application of the law. When the statutes provide for enforcement actions by individual consumers, the statutory penalty model has the potential to provide the individual with a straightforward means of redress, often without need to even hire an attorney. Attorneys are getting involved though, and it is leading us toward a system where businesses are being regulated one jury at a time.

By |2015-08-21T14:38:32-04:00August 21, 2015|News, Top Stories|0 Comments

Accutane Ruling Affirms New Jersey Law is Headed in the Right Direction

This morning the Appellate Division issued an important ruling in the ongoing litigation over Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.’s acne medication Accutane. The ruling brings to a close a case that has been bogging down the court system for over a decade, and sends a clear message that some choice of law questions are no longer open for debate.

By |2015-08-11T15:48:25-04:00August 11, 2015|News, Press Releases, Top Stories|0 Comments

An Appealing Policy Change

Did you know New Jersey is one of only eleven states where the court system is required to give tobacco companies a benefit that other defendants are denied? It’s true. As part of the Master Settlement Agreement reached in 1998, New Jersey agreed to put a cap on the amount of money tobacco companies must post as bond in order to appeal adverse verdicts in exchange for money and other concessions from the 5 tobacco companies involved in the litigation. To this day, tobacco companies are the only defendants in New Jersey that get the benefit of an appeal bond cap.

By |2015-07-10T13:13:40-04:00July 10, 2015|News, Top Stories|0 Comments
Go to Top